Table of Contents
I would certainly include Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is someplace in the top 3 however with those domestics you absolutely have my top four of all time for reliability. Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine issue. Corrosion is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just seemed like a diesel.
I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's very own method ... the 300i6 would do every little thing I need this truck to do patgizz created: 3 points in the automotive world refuse to damage.
those must be held as the standard to which whatever else is gauged. sadly, almost every little thing else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 naturally) Wow, due to the outpour of praise, it looked great so I got it, below's the ad lmk what you guys assume Oops, didn't indicate to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz however, I'm fairly large, and the guiding wheel to seat is relatively narrow ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only problem I've ever seen with vehicles like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little as well difficult and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage won't be the ideal in the globe, but it will certainly damn sure run forever. Never had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 freeway with the OD5. I wonder how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's very own way ... The engine bay had not been designed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One container eliminate an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, however it sucks. Mod electric motors need to come out sideways and you need to draw the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core assistance does not unlock like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane composed: spitfirebill created: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he state to warrant this? I'm really interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would certainly require this response. "They are usually trusted as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones created: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Rust is a various story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply appeared like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not explain ... my poor In respond to spitfirebill: I added that factor due to the fact that when I had to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go with each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that had not been sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to chat concerning a few issues of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is far better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Allow's chat about engine and actually simply to define that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a lengthy time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you understand, around that time also. So we're not going to obtain back into, into the earlier things. Because 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more popular and I wouldn't actually advise a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with strike to these engines, because they didn't have enough threading in the trigger plug, which caused troubles.
Very extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not make clear ... my negative In respond to spitfirebill: I added that point because when I needed to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that had not been sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're mosting likely to speak about a few problems of these vans, but I I'm plainly not mosting likely to appear and state one is better than the various other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are several of the differences between these 2 brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same automobile.
Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. Allow's speak concerning engine and really just to define that the design years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a lengthy time.
And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around because, you recognize, around that time also. So we're not going to obtain back right into, into the earlier things. Given that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more preferred and I wouldn't actually recommend a V6 engine.
There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with impact to these engines, because they didn't have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which created problems.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer around Garland
Ford F150 dealer near me Garland, Texas
Ford F150 dealer near me Garland